Update on House Bill 849

One of my recent blog entries discussed House Bill 849, a welcome product of Florida's 2011 legislative session.  House Bill 849 created new Florida Statute Section 514.0315, which  gives pool owners the option of installing any of five different types of equipment in order to meet the requirements of the Virginia Graeme Baker Act.

The legislature forwarded this bill to Florida's Governor for approval and our Governor signed 849 into law on Friday, June 24.

The provisions of this new law  will become effective on July 1, 2011.

New Law May Help Manufactured Housing ROCs Deal With Code Violations

Earlier this month, Governor Scott signed into law Chapter 2011-105, the Committee Substitute for Senate Bill 650.

One of the highlights of this Senate Bill is the creation of a new section of Chapter 723, Florida's statutes governing mobile home park tenancies.

New Florida Statute Section 723.024--Compliance by mobile home park owners and mobile home owners--states as follows:

"Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or of any local law, ordinance, or code:

  • (1)  If a unit of local government finds that a violation of a local code or ordinance has occurred, the unit of local government shall cite the responsible party for the violation and enforce the citation under its local code and ordinance enforcement authority.
  • (2)  A lien, penalty, fine, or other administrative or civil proceeding may not be brought against a mobile home owner or mobile home for any duty or responsibility of the mobile home park owner under s. 723.022 or against a mobile home park owner for any duty or responsibility of the mobile home owner under s. 723.023."

Up until now, owners of manufactured housing communities (whether ROCs or third party investors) were often hesitant to contact local authorities to help remedy a home owner's violation of a local code or ordinance (for example, a health or building code violation) for fear that the local authorities would cite the park owner, rather than the home owner, for the violation.

This new law should eliminate that hesitancy in regards to home owners that are violating local codes or ordinances in resident owned manufactured housing communities. 

It's clear that this new provision will apply to mobile home owners that are not members of a cooperative, condominium or mandatory homeowners' association that owns or has the rights and responsibilities of enforcing the rules or covenants governing the community.  

I would also suggest that there are very strong arguments in favor of F.S 723.024 applying to those home owners that are members of the condominium, cooperative, or mandatory homeowners' association that operates the manufactured housing community.  It's apparent from the express language of this new section that it is the party that is actually violating the code or ordinance that should be held responsible for that violation.

That's a welcome clarification for managers and board members in manufactured housing community ROCs and will certainly assist in the enforcement of community rules and regulations.

F.S. 723.024 became effective on the day it was signed by our Governor--June 2, 2011.

Down goes the "3 minute time limit"!

House Bill 1195  made its way through the Florida legislature and was presented to our Governor on June 13.  It appears that our Governor will sign the bill--although nothing is certain nowadays--and  the provisions contained in HB 1195 that amend various sections of Chapters 718, 719, and 720 of the Florida Statutes will become effective on July 1, 2011.

There's a very curious amendment to F.S. Section 720.303 that will impact the ability of ROC board members and managers to control the behavior of members attending board meetings.

We all know that unit owners are entitled to attend almost all board meetings of a condominium or cooperative association and are entitled to speak on all designated agenda items.  Lot owners in mandatory homeowners' associations have a similar right to attend meeting of their association's board and, according to F.S. Section 720.303(2)(b), they also have the right "to speak on any matter placed on the agenda by petition of the voting interests for at least 3 minutes."

Chapters 718, 719, and 720 each contain provisions allowing the association to adopt reasonable written rules governing the frequency, duration, and manner of unit owner statements.

But what exactly constitutes a "reasonable" rule in regards to "duration"?   In other words, how long should a member be entitled  to speak on a particular agenda item?

There is nothing in the condominium or cooperative statutes to help answer this question.  However, ROC managers, board members, and their attorneys could look to that "3 minute limitation" in F.S. Section 720.303(2)(b) for some guidance.   We've thus often suggested to our ROC clients that limiting a member to speaking for no more than three minutes on any agenda item would appear to be reasonable.

However, if HB 1195 is signed by the Governor, effective July 1, 2011, that three minute standard will be removed from F.S. 720.303(2)(b).  Members attending board meetings in mandatory homeowners associations will have the right to speak at such meetings "with reference to all designated items".

It's interesting that the provision does not specify "designated agenda items" as do both the similar provisions in Chapters 718 and 719.

While I have no idea why the "3 minute limitation" was removed, I do know that it's still very important to have reasonable written rules governing the behavior of members at board and membership meetings.

Hopefully, resident owned communities that don't have those written rules will put that task on their "to do" lists this summer.

 

An Italian Art Lesson for ROC members

My wife and I just returned from a very hectic but enjoyable trip to Italy.   One of the towns we visited was Siena, in the country's Tuscany region.

Siena is drenched in history and is known for its Piazza del Campo, an incredible "town square" that dates from the 13th century.  The Piazza del Campo is also the site of a famous horse race that occurs twice each summer.  The other highlight of the "Campo" is Palazzo Pubblico, Siena's ancient and impressive town hall.

Inside the Palazzo Pubblico is a massive fresco called "The Allegory of The Good and Bad Government".  It's regarded as one of the masterpieces of the Renaissance and is one of the few pieces of art from the 14th century that's does not have a purely theological theme.

I'll blog about a less "artsy" topic in my next entry but in the meantime I hope you'll check out the links I've posted and agree with my feeling that It's nice to know that the importance of good governance was a topic of discussion almost seven centuries ago.

Ciao!